And what is the percentage rate of times this approach works as opposed to times they get shot down? Or is the whole idea that it won't work and will just illicit a response?

I didn't scold him I just didn't accept his friend invite. But in the past I have asked men point blank if that EVER worked. lol

I suspect there are as many motivations for sending unsolicited photos of one's genitals to women one doesn't know as there are men who do it. To me it's always seemed like the online equivalent to fondling oneself on the bus - sort of furtive, desperate and masochistic. Overall, it generally seems to be just as much or more about power/attention as sex. On the other hand, in all-male sexual cultures it's very common to fixate on penises too so clearly focusing on disembodied boy parts is part of male sexual culture in a way it's not part of female sexual culture. The irony of this is that studies have shown that women actually watch body parts more than men do when watching porn (men focus on the face more, women on the genitals) and that women are generally turned on by a much wider variety o f sexual images. (And that there are many men pay prostitutes as much for the companionship and attention as for the sex.)

Papa - There probably are some men/boys so naive to real female sexuality and women in general, as well as social mores, that they think as you suggest, or whose only exposure to women is through porn (pun incidental but I'm leaving it! ;-) One can easily explain sending strange people genital shots if one considers they're coming from a guy with no female friends, no real interest in women as people and the mistaken idea that real world sex is the same as porn (or so little real world experience with consensual, non-paid sexual or emotional sharing that they confuse porn with real world sex and don't understand it's simulation/acting for the camera/contrived). I suspect quite a few people who do this kind of thing in inappropriate places are masochists who actually welcome and enjoy being told they're creepy and disgusting - it's a form of power, a distorted form of power but it's about power and being noticed none the less.

Personally, I tend to find that most snapshots of people's junk or nudie pix are kinda aesthetically gross like the candid shots in Hustler used to be - bad lighting that highlights bad skin and imperfections, bad hair and makeup, etc. Not that I'm all about airbrushing out realness, there's just no need to send people a genital mug shot that basically screams "I'm a convicted sex offender who exposes myself to children too". I mean, I guess people put up photos of themselves looking really ugly and badly dressed and hope for dates from super hot people too but why should anyone else care about or want your body if you clearly don't?

On another note, a lot of men who watch a lot of porn and don't have real world relationships with women have a very distorted perception of how hot they actually are and how possible it is for ugly, boorish men to get free, no-strings sex with young nymphets and beautiful women who are hot for their penis even though they're short, fat and hairy like Ron Jeremy (who is in the video to appeal to men and not women in the first place). Not that short, hairy and round men can't be sexy in their own right as people, they're just not the usual "sexy male object" for women if we're talking purely physical aesthetics.

funny. Though a shot of an exceptionally pretty pussy might be appetizing, I hardly doubt it would "reel me in" to friend them, by itself. More likely, I'd suspect some dude was behind it. lol

>"i completely dig watching my guy jack off. but others, no. and randomly, no. "

Ah hahahaha. Funny how that is, huh?